Walcott’s anonymity shows wingers’ freedom of touchline is no more

Theo Walcott’s anonymity in the first leg against Manchester United showed why there is a lack of natural wingers nowadays and as the game has evolved, so has their skill set.
______________________________________________________________________________
walcott-united

Arsenal Wenger has normally never played with traditional wingers. Overmars was probably the first and ultimately the last until Walcott came about. Pires and Ljungberg were both converted attacking midfielders while Hleb and Rosicky have always shown their creative roots. But even with their differences, all including Overmars, had more to them than just being able to run past defenders; all thought with their head rather than their feet.

“I like to have one behind the striker, and one or two on the flanks who come inside,” said Wenger. “I always feel that if you have players who can deliver the decisive ball in all areas of the pitch, you have many more chances of being creative. If it’s only focused on one central part, where it’s usually more concentrated, you have more space on the flanks to create.”

Arshavin and Nasri both fall into the category of ‘Wenger style’ wingers but with Walcott’s increasing integration to the starting line up perhaps there is a slight change of philosophy. Against Chelsea, the manager started with Van Persie on the left and Walcott on the right as he wanted to play with ‘wingers,’ as he put it but in the end were too orthodox. Only at the beginning when Van Persie interchanged with Diaby were Chelsea most threatened and incidentally when the goal came about. At Manchester United, the Red Devils packed the midfield, Rooney then forced Walcott back with United’s early attacking impetus and after the goal, vigorously closed down the winger.

Most of today’s game is about space; pressing to deny space and to make best advantage when you get the space. Former Ecuador manager Luis Fernando Suarez argues the physical development of the game and the packing of central midfield means that more emphasis should be placed on the wings. Around a quarter of goals  from open play come from a cross and teams are quick to stop that happening.

If that happens wingers are effectively phased out unless they have more in the locker to get themselves out. Hence the decrease of the natural winger; someone who will come back to the dressing room with chalk on their boots but will actually have one good game in five. Unpredictability is the key weapon in today’s game and it is better to have those that can maximise the spaces. Rinus Michels speaks of ‘operational space’ and that is where the big sides excel in (think Manchester United’s front four last season).

There are many good wide men but in an utilitarian game coaches prefer to have those players that can not only stick to the touchline but can come off the flanks to exploit the space that is potentially on offer.

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “Walcott’s anonymity shows wingers’ freedom of touchline is no more

  1. closing down wingers is becoming an absolute necessity unless the winger’s name is jesper gronkjaer..remember him. In his case, it was better to let him cross the ball because his delivery was so weak. Wingers now at Arsenal and indeed everyone else need to not only have good ability to deliver crosses, they also have obligations to come in to help the main striker. I think at one point Bendtner played on the right wing, strictly speaking he wasn’t a winger, just that he could run at players and make those late runs. Chelsea are doing this currently as well aren’t they with Anelka, although it didn’t work when Grant tried to do it.

  2. The brain – that comment was surely aimed at the idiotic first comment. This blog makes really interesting reading. I like the tactical analysis – it’s a relief from the tabloid nature of so many blogs.

  3. It comes by no surprise, we have yet to see Walcott trouble a top class full back over 90mins, as Gallas stated, he is too easy to read by the top full backs, they do not fear pace, they fear intelligence both on and off the ball, something that Walcott is still developing.

  4. Walcott has to bring a new dimension to his game. He essentially just does the running and is very predictable with his moves. One can more or less bet on where he is going to be. But this may not be such a bad thing. I think the flaw lies in the fact that he is very right-sided. Most of the times he cuts a defender to his own right. And playin on the right this means he is essentially taking the ball away from the center. Pires and Henry , are also right-sided players(i dont know if that is the appropriate word). They played great on the left wing. This was because it was easier for them to cut in.
    Walcott on the other hand wouldnt be able to use his enormous pace if he cuts in. What can change is probably the running of the other players when Walcott has the ball at his feet. Many a time when he does cross there is no one at the near post. Walcott will definitely have to add a dimension to his game. Hopefully he will graduate then to play in the position he was meant to play, as striker. Dont see that happenin next season also though.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s